Answer:
You were close; you don’t have to add 3x to the right side though.
We’re given 2y= -3x + 6
Step one: divide both sides by 2
y= (-3/2)x + 3
Answer:
44.057 to nearest hundredth
44.06
Answer:
(c) BC ≅ BC, reflexive property
Step-by-step explanation:
The conclusion of this proof derives from CPCTC and the SAS congruence postulate. In order for SAS to apply, corresponding sides and the angle between them must be shown to be congruent. The congruence statement ...
ΔABC ≅ ΔDCB
tells you these pairs of sides and angles are congruent:
- AB ≅ DC . . . . statement 2
- ∠ABC ≅ ∠DCB . . . . statement 4
- BC ≅ CB . . . . (missing statement 5)
- AC ≅ DB . . . . statement 7
That is, the statement needed to complete the proof is a statement that segment BC is congruent to itself. That congruence is a result of the reflexive property of congruence.
The correct true statement is the swimmer comes back up 9 seconds after the timer was started.
<h3>Maximum height of a function</h3>
The maximum height of a function is the point where the velocity the body is zero.
Given the function that represent the height of the swimmer as h(t)=t^2−12t+27
If the velocity of the function is zero, hence;
h'(t) = 2t - 12
0 = 2t - 12
2t = 12
t = 6secs
Substitute t = 6 into the function as shown:
h(6) = 6^2−12(6)+27
h(6) = 36 - 72 + 27
h(6) = -36 + 27
h(6) = -9 feet
Hence the correct true statement is the swimmer comes back up 9 seconds after the timer was started.
Learn more on maximum height here: brainly.com/question/23144757
#SPJ1
