Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
I wanna say the Romans if im wrong PLEASE feel free to correct me.
Answer:
C. All flying creatures I have ever seen have feathers. That creature up in the sky is certainly flying, so it must also have feathers.
Explanation:
Syllogism is a logical argument with two premises and one conclusion. A categorical syllogism has three propositions which include two premises and one conclusion; a general/major premise, a minor premise and then a conclusion. The major premise,minor premise and conclusion in the above syllogism respectfully are
" All flying creatures I have ever seen have feathers","That creature up in the sky is certainly flying", "so it must also have feathers".
I would have to say to whom it may concern. Since it is showing correct vocabulary and directing it towards the person who ends up reading it.
The Phoenicians were based on a narrow coastal strip of the Levant which gave them an excellent transcontinental position. They used their seafaring skills and created a network of colonies and trade centers across the ancient Mediterranean. Phoenician sea trade can be divided into that for its colonies and that with fellow trading civilizations. The Phoenicians not only imported what they needed and exported what they cultivated and manufactured but they could also act as middlemen traders.
