La respuesta correcta a esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
La explicación del texto "Somos integrantes de una sociedad, formamos parte de la cultura. Crecemos y nos educamos en ella y a la vez, contribuimos a construirla y modificarla," sería la siguiente.
Somos ciudadanos de un país que está formado por una diversidad de etnias y formas de pensar, unidos por un mismo concepto de soberanía que significa la capacidad de crear un gobierno autónomo e independiente de cualquier influencia exterior, representado básicamente por el territorio, la forma de gobierno y nosotros los ciudadanos.
Nosotros como ciudadanos formamos la cultura del país por medio de nuestro sistema de creencias, valores, costumbres, lenguaje y tradiciones. Eso es lo que nos hace ser un país único ante el mundo, a pesar de que al interior existan diversas formas de pensar, de acuerdo a nuestros orígenes.
El que pueden ejercer su libre derecho a elegir su propia forma de gobierno y a sus gobernantes, para convertirse en estados democráticos en donde se respete la ley. Crecemos en esta cultura que ha sido heredada por nuestros padres y nosotros la heredaremos a nuestros hijos. A nosotros nos toca seguir construyendo esa identidad y cultura para perfeccionarla.
Answer:
Where Norton sees Millie and his heart begins to race at the same time he feels excited.
Explanation:
It's called the 2-emotion theory for this 2 emotions that bring about these two mind and physiological perceptions:
1 He(Norton) sees her (Millie)= COGNITIVE "response" then...
2 (As a consequence) he feels his heart banging his chest with a pump force (use of suproxin in participants tests) =PHYSIOLOGICAL response.
3 He feels excited. Cognitive response.
Answer:
Generally, conflicts arise from mismatches between power, organizational demands and feelings of personal worth..
<em>Human relations view of conflict means to accept that conflict is a important aspect of any organization. Rather than seeing it as a negative or a necessity it needs to be managed. If all of that is right. Then an example would be; If one person agues that Alternating current electricity is better than direct current electricity and the other says the opposite. The outcome now is that it is more beneficial we use both in everyday life. A/C is a safer and simplistic use of electricity for power converters while d/c is needed to supply a constant frequency current to LED lighting. Without both sides advancing we wouldn’t be able to keep progressing. or maybe that is a bad example… Maybe you start a business and you feel quality is a better formula than quantity. But you have such a high demand for your product your cheaper opponents outsell you. So now you decide to make a part of the product with a cheaper material. Thus still being superior product yet the quality has decreased. But now you have achieved a higher goal than you would have otherwise. I think conflict helps a company grow but if it leans too far one way outcome will become someone else’s achievement. If you cut out all conflict you may never be able to adapt to succeed.</em><em>.</em><em> </em>
What to produce, how to produce, and for whom to produce.
