Answer:
is the axis of symmetry
Step-by-step explanation:
i believe this is the answer :)
The height of the isosceles triangle is 8.49 inches.
<h3>
How to find the height of the triangle?</h3>
Here we have a triangle such that two of the sides measure 9 inches, and the base measures 6 inches.
So this is an isosceles triangle.
We can divide the isosceles triangle into two smaller right triangles, such that the side that measures 9 inches is the hypotenuse, the base is 3 inches, and the height of the isosceles triangle is the other cathetus.
By Pythagorean's theorem, we can write:
(9in)^2 = (3 in)^2 + h^2
Where h is the height that we are trying to find.
Solving that for h we get:
h = √( (9 in)^2 - (3in)^2) = 8.49 inches.
We conclude that the height of the isosceles triangle is 8.49 inches.
If you want to learn more about triangles:
brainly.com/question/2217700
#SPJ1
Answer: 1/5 or 8 houses. Company X provides electricity to 8 houses, Company Y provides to 24 houses, so that would mean Company Z provides 8
1) The solution for m² - 5m - 14 = 0 are x=7 and x=-2.
2)The solution for b² - 4b + 4 = 0 is x=2.
<u>Step-by-step explanation</u>:
The general form of quadratic equation is ax²+bx+c = 0
where
- a is the coefficient of x².
- b is the coefficient of x.
- c is the constant term.
<u>To find the roots :</u>
- Sum of the roots = b
- Product of the roots = c
1) The given quadratic equation is m² - 5m - 14 = 0.
From the above equation, it can be determined that b = -5 and c = -14
The roots are -7 and 2.
- Sum of the roots = -7+2 = -5
- Product of the roots = -72 = -14
The solution is given by (x-7) (x+2) = 0.
Therefore, the solutions are x=7 and x= -2.
2) The given quadratic equation is b² - 4b + 4 = 0.
From the above equation, it can be determined that b = -4 and c = 4
The roots are -2 and -2.
- Sum of the roots = -2-2 = -4
- Product of the roots = -2-2 = 4
The solution is given by (x-2) (x-2) = 0.
Therefore, the solution is x=2.
Correction:
Because F is not present in the statement, instead of working onP(E)P(F) = P(E∩F), I worked on
P(E∩E') = P(E)P(E').
Answer:
The case is not always true.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that the odds for E equals the odds against E', then it is correct to say that the E and E' do not intersect.
And for any two mutually exclusive events, E and E',
P(E∩E') = 0
Suppose P(E) is not equal to zero, and P(E') is not equal to zero, then
P(E)P(E') cannot be equal to zero.
So
P(E)P(E') ≠ 0
This makes P(E∩E') different from P(E)P(E')
Therefore,
P(E∩E') ≠ P(E)P(E') in this case.