Answer:
TRUE
Explanation:
The coupon rate for a bond is fixed and is paid by the issuer of the bond to the bondholder. The cash outlay/inflow to the issuer/bondholder is always the same reardless of the market rate.
The effect of the market rate is on the cost to acquire the bond in the secondary market. It do not change the coupon obligation.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
D / V = 1000 / 4000
Dividing 1000 by 4000 gives 0.25 = 25%
E / V = 3000 / 4000
Dividing 3000 by 4000 gives 0.75 = 75%
Answer:
The correct answer is all of the above
Explanation:
Scrap or the rework costs are the costs which is incurred in order to repair the items that are defective. And the decision to rework or scrap an item or product, ground on the benefits or advantage of the incremental costs.
If the reworked units generate or yield greater advantage or benefit rather than the selling them as scrap, then the decision to rework will be considered.
And if the decision of rework is taken, then the management should consider the incremental costs, revenue or profit from selling the defective units as scarp and the lost profit on selling and making the new units while the rework is performed.
Answer:
B. the demand for a product and its price has a direct relationship
Explanation:
demand comes from the price which ultimately effects the proportions with the consumers purchasing the product. if the product is good enough with a fair price to come with it, the demand will increase, or if a product becomes more scarce the demand for it will increase along with the price raising.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": Neither Italy or New Zealand.
Explanation:
Comparative advantage is the ability of an individual or organization to manufacture its products at a lower opportunity cost than its competitors. The scenario does not imply the individual has an absolute advantage. It actually means it sacrifices less to achieve that goal.
Thus, <em>Portugal has a lower opportunity cost than Italy in producing a bottle of wine. Portugal's opportunity cost is 1/2 while Italy's opportunity cost is 2. Neither Italy or New Zealand (or any other country not mentioned in the example) has a comparative advantage in producing wine</em>.