Answer:
Both parties experience surplus, but there is inequity because Steve has a much larger producer surplus
Explanation:
The options to this question wasn't provided. Here are the options : Both parties experience surplus, but there is inequity because Steve has a much larger producer surplus. Both parties experience surplus, so the transaction was equitable. Only Steve benefits from the sale. Srivani will not be happy with her purchase.
Consumer surplus is the difference between the willingness to pay of a consumer and the price of the good.
Producer surplus is the difference between the price of a good and the least amount the seller is willing to sell his good.
While both parties earn a surplus, the producer surplus exceeds the consumer surplus . Therefore, the seller benefited more from the trade than the consumer.
I hope my answer helps you
customer satisfaction; earn long-term profits; increased shareholder value
Answer:
True
Explanation:
The matching principle states that only those payments and receipts which actually are paid or received. the interest accrued is not included unless it is paid
Answer:
Explanation:
Rightly ignored a sunk cost since he cannot recover the money back and it really does not have any effect on the decision in the future
Answer: The correct answers are a) & b). That is MARTHA, MARTHA; JANE.
Explanation: Absolute advantage exists when a party can oroduce a highe quantity of a good or product. This is the situation with Martha in her productions.
Comparative advantage on the other hand is when a party has a lower opportunity cost. This exists in both the production of quilts and chocolate chip cookies.
