Answer:
embezzlement
Explanation:
the act of withholding assets for the purpose of conversion of such assets, by one or more persons to whom the assets were entrusted, either to be held or to be used for specific purposes. Embezzlement is a type of financial fraud
Answer:
This is an answer that requires a personal opinion. I will give you my opinion with an explanation so you can understand it and if you want, you can modify it.
Explanation:
I agree.
What this question proposes to us is that there is no absolute truth when it comes to morality.
There is no one truth about morality that applies to everyone as if it were a rule. And this happens because there are many sets of subjective norms, beliefs, values and customs that direct or guide the behavior of groups of people in society and that vary depending on each person.
Something that is moral for a certain cultural group may not be for another in another part of the world.
That is why in my personal opinion I agree that there is no objective 'truth' in morality. "
Answer:
The case has yo be decided first and in The Supreme Court
Answer:
Specific deterrence prevents crime by frightening an individual defendant with punishment. ... Incapacitation prevents crime by removing a defendant from society. Rehabilitation prevents crime by altering a defendant's behavior. Retribution prevents crime by giving victims or society a feeling of avengement.
Explanation:
mark brainliest plss plss plss╥﹏╥╥﹏╥╥﹏╥╥﹏╥
The answer should be Arizona v. United States (2012). One of the main points brought up by this ruling was an Arizona state-law making it a crime for being unlawfully present in the United States. This made it more likely for a Hispanic person to be racially profiled by law enforcement.
I hope this helps! :)
