Answer:
36 dollars
Step-by-step explanation:
this is basic math just use multiplication i think u typed the problem whrong
1. Make an equation.
Moving company #1: y = 17x + 840
Moving company #2: y = 22x + 760
2. Put the equations together and solve
17x + 840 = 22x + 760
-17x -17x
840 = 5x + 760
-760 -760
80 = 5x
5 5
16 = x
When a job is 16 hours they both charge the same thing.
Answer: both c and d can be correct because equal or more force must be applied to stop an object in motion. I would lean towards c because of d saying “tend”
Step-by-step explanation: Newton’s first law states that if a body is at rest or moving at a constant speed in a straight line, it will remain at rest or keep moving in a straight line at constant speed unless it is acted upon by a force.
Answer:
c. 4y -x = 8
Step-by-step explanation:
Each of the equations can be put into slope-intercept form (solved for y) as follows:
a: y = 4x +9
b: y = 4x -8
c: y = (1/4)x +2
d: y = 4x -4
___
The equations containing the term "4x" all describe parallel lines. The equation containing (1/4)x describes a line that intersects the given line. It is not parallel to the others.
Answer:
Larry would be wrong if 2(as a prime number) is part of the numbers that has 2 at its ones place, but if 2 is not there, then he is correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
Firstly, we need to know what a composite number is. In simple terms, a composite number is a number that is not a prime number. Meaning that, if a number has more than two factors (1 and itself which is the definition for a prime number), then the number is a composite number.
Larry says all numbers that have 2 in their ones place are composite. It depends, if 2 is the only number that makes up the digit, that is the number itself is 2, then it's obviously a prime number. But any other number having 2 at its ones place is definitely a composite number because the number has more than 2 factors; 1, itself and 2. Example:
12, some of the factors is 1, 12 and 2. Therefore it is a composite number.
Larry would be wrong if 2(as a prime number) is part of the numbers that has 2 at its ones place, but if 2 is not there, then he is correct.
