1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zavuch27 [327]
3 years ago
11

The social psychologist who is best known for his controversial series of studies investigating obedience to authority is:

Social Studies
2 answers:
notsponge [240]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: Stanley Milgram (1933-1984)

Explanation:

Stanley Milgram lived between 1933-1984. He was best known for his experiment that centered on "Obedience to authority" which he conducted in 1960 when he was having his professorship at Harvard University in social psychology. His experiment was affected by the happening of event during the holocaust, most notably when Adolf Eichmann was being tried.

Stanley Milgram is one of the major personality in the history of social psychology.

Roman55 [17]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:    Stanley Milgram

Explanation:  As Stanley Milgram himself stated, the essence of obedience to authority is when a person begins to perceive himself as a tool to fulfil the wishes of the authority, not his own wishes, so he sees all his actions and consequences of these actions as a result of the action of authority, not as a result of his will and responsibility. Milgram based his experiment on the conflict that arises between the state of obedience and the conscience of a person who subordinated to authority. The essence of the experiment concerned the responsibility of those who committed genocide during WWII, who claimed to have been merely obedient, i.e executing the orders of superiors, and based their defense on this claim. This begs the question of whether or not they were complicit in the genocide.

The experiment was performed with pairs of participants where one was a "student" and the other was a "teacher", and where the student was connected to an electroshock electrode. Each time a student would give a wrong answer, the teacher would activate electricity through the electrodes and the student would experience an electric shock. With each wrong answer, the teacher would increase the level of electric shock. There are also some moderation in the experiment, such as a student would make a mistake on purpose, etc.

The conclusion is that ordinary people are generally willing to kill people, even if they are innocent in order to execute the orders of superiors, recognised as authority. It is considered that when it comes to authority, all its orders are justified and legal. So it is moral and proper to follow the orders of authority, whatever it may be.

You might be interested in
Which cause is the biggest cause of the Civil War?
brilliants [131]

Answer:

want of land

Explanation:

a bunch of countries wanted land and faught over it

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Roughly what percentage of americans rarely or never vote
mart [117]
Unfortunately, Americans vote under pressure. So I don't know.
3 0
3 years ago
Ken, Elizabeth, and Charlie are in charge of a week-long Chinese language summer camp. This year, they promised the children's p
Snezhnost [94]

Answer:

1.Positive Reinforcement, 2.Negative Reinforcement, 3.Foot in the door phenomenon, 4.Conformity, and 5. Obedience

Explanation:

POSITIVE REINFORCEMENT- for completing the time studying their language, a reward is given such as a day at the lake.

NEGATIVE REINFORCEMENT- taking something away that they don't want, example if they study, they don't have to clean.

FOOT IN THE DOOR PHENOMENON: This slowly increases amount of studying (Start with one hour, build to five hours).

CONFORMITY: This involves putting individuals who hates studying with a group of people who study.

OBEDIENCE: for example, Counselors are in charge and they enforce studying

5 0
3 years ago
1. Bernard organizes a party with many important people who all come to see the Savage, but John refuses to come out of his room
ch4aika [34]

John is a character who struggles with the idea of becoming fully adapted to the society of this brave new world. He has a deep appreciation for the humanist and philosophical concepts that existed at other times in history, and he is particularly fond of William Shakespeare. In this instance, John refuses to come to the party because he did not want to meet other people. This, however, causes problems for Bernard, as it makes his guests angry.It also causes some problems for Lenina, as she begins to think that he does not like her. John is justified to act in this way, as he has decided that he does not want to follow all the mandates of the new world.

6 0
2 years ago
Are these correct if so what the answer
stepladder [879]

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

o

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The presence of four vehicles and a pedestrian approaching an intersection at the same time might represent a situation to _____
    11·1 answer
  • Membership in a minority group is voluntary. <br> a. True <br> b. False
    11·1 answer
  • Which ancient society first coined the word astronomy and contributed important early work in this dispute.
    10·1 answer
  • Which prime minister won the Nobel Peace Prize?
    7·2 answers
  • Will give first brainliest.
    11·1 answer
  • The silk road connected chang 'an with what african city
    7·1 answer
  • List three historical issues that have been used to debate the different interpretations of the Constitution. Then choose one of
    10·1 answer
  • Mention the causes why the sculptures of Nepal are more or less related to religious traditions.​
    14·1 answer
  • Write the five characteristics of a good government?​
    5·2 answers
  • Located on the Ogeechee River, what city became Georgia's capital in 1796?
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!