A prejudiced person may not act on his thoughts although prejudice includes all affective, behavioural and cognitive components of an attitude. Whereas discrimination only involves behaviour.
So I'd say: prejudice is cognitive
And discrimination is behavioural
Hope that answer on right track
Answer:
Scientific discoveries challenged long-held ideas. The discovery of penicillin lead to development of antibiodics to treat infection.
Explanation:
An agent is bound to inform a client of all facts regarding the client's transaction. this includes both the facts that the agent knows and those that <u>the agent should have known.</u>
<u></u>
Any person who has been given authorization to act on someone else's behalf, in a number of capacities, is referred to as an agent. This could entail carrying out a will, selling a home, managing a sporting or acting career, serving as a company agent, etc. A representative, such as an attorney or a stockbroker, is authorized to act on behalf of another person.
Attorneys, who represent their customers in legal proceedings, and stockbrokers, who are employed by investors to make financial decisions, are two popular sorts of agents. In these cases, the agent's client is referred to as the principle.
To know more about agent
brainly.com/question/15052146
#SPJ4
The Gupta empire.........
Answer:
The main point here on the appeal would be the fact that the Sherrods decided to stay silent on the last offer made by the Kidds to settle the situation, and rather decided to go ahead and look for a mandatory arbitration. When the Sherrods did that, the Kidds might have understood that they were not accepting their offer for 34.000 dollars and preffered to settle for the result of the mandatory arbitration, which established the price at 25.000 dollars.
Another point is that there was a big time lapse between the last offer made by the Kidds to settle with the Sherrods and their communicating that they would go for that final settlement offer, especially after the mandatory arbitration had already established a new price. This time lapse should also be taken in favor of the Kidds in their appeal
Finally, the matter should have ended when the final decision for the arbitration was given
So it should be expected that on appeal the decision reached in the mandatory arbritration be upheld, instead of the new sum which was initially assumed not accepted by the Sherrods when they went through with the arbitration.
