Answer:
d. officers becoming personally involved with informants.
Explanation:
An informant is a person who gives his testimony in relation to a situation as a way to help in the investigation of something. These people cannot be considered a witness of a situation, because they are not formally obliged to speak the truth about the facts of the situation (the witness is obliged to speak the truth), and they can tell fanciful, uncooperative and incorrect information.
In this case, it is extremely unethical for the information that an informant provides to be overestimated, because that information may be false. moreover, an informant cannot be intimidated or coerced into contributing to a given situation, nor can he be deceived about its relevance in the investigation, through false praise. However, in terms of ethics and morals, nothing prevents officers from personally getting involved with informants.
<span>"according to some research, the degree" of implicit prejudice has declined, but the degree of explicit </span><span>prejudice keeps it alive under the surface.
</span>
Implicit and explicit are two opposite words, the meaning of implicit is, "inferred or saw however not doubtlessly or straightforwardly communicated." whereas explicit means "to completely and unmistakably express something, leaving nothing suggested."
1 is Kiev
the last one. True
I would answer the others but i don't know the answers completely.
Answer:
C. A government that soon adopted communist reforms and ideals.
Explanation:
Take a look at Cuba and it's government today, how was it influenced? The Cuban Revolution influenced it with Fidel Castro's ideals of Communism.
