Answer:
the others are already answered
Explanation:
For general intent, the prosecution need only prove that the defendant intended to do the act in question, whereas proving specific intent would require the prosecution to prove that the defendant intended to bring about a specific consequence through his or her actions, or that he or she perform the action
Answer:
The doctrine of contributory negligence is followed in most states is false.
Explanation:
Contributory negligence is a doctrine of common law that if a person was injured in part due to his/her own negligence, that is his/her negligence contributed to the accident, the injured party would not be entitled to collect any damages (money) from another party who supposedly caused the accident.
And historically, contributory negligence was the rule in all states, leading to harsh results. Many states now developed and adopted comparative negligence laws. Today, the jurisdictions that still use contributory negligence are few.
Title IX aims to prevent any sort of discrimination in schools that receive federal funding based on sex.
Title IX:
- Is a federal law that was enacted in 1972
- Aims to prevent discrimination based on sex in any educational program and institution that receives federal funding
Sex was not specifically protected in the 1964 Civil Rights Act in terms of educational institutions. Title IX was therefore passed to rectify this and the federal government enforces this by making action against sex based discrimination, a requisite for receiving federal funding.
In conclusion, Title IX aims to prevent sex-based discrimination in schools and other educational institutions and programs.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/16080067. </em>
