This question is based on "The Most Dangerous Game" which is a short story that was written by <span>Richard Connell. And based on this story, the response of Rainsford to Zaroff only shows that he is against of the thought of human hunting. The answer to this would be the first option.</span>
Answer:
Many also face challenges emanating from high population growth rates, often high illiteracy rates, ethnic and religious conflict, outdated traditional education systems, and political corruption
The true statement is that: <em>There is an inverse relationship between the </em><em>quantity of money</em><em> demanded and the </em><em>interest rate.</em>
In economics, money can be defined as any asset used by an individual or business entity to make purchases of goods and services at a specific period of time.
Simply stated, money refers to any asset which can be used to purchase goods and services by customers.
This ultimately implies that, money is any recognized economic unit that is generally accepted as a medium of exchange for goods and services, as well as repayment of debts such as loans, taxes across the world.
An interest rate can be defined as an amount of money that is charged as a percentage of the total amount borrowed by a borrower from a creditor or financial institution.
On a related note, there exist an inverse relationship between the quantity of money demanded by a borrower and the interest rate charged by a creditor or lender. Thus, when the interest rate is high, the quantity of money demanded decreases (falls) while the quantity of money demanded increases (rises) when the interest rate is low.
<em>In conclusion, borrowers are more likely to demand for</em><em> money</em><em> when the </em><em>interest rate</em><em> is low and vice-versa.</em>
<em />
<em>For more information on money supply, visit: brainly.com/question/15344073</em>
<span>Business people in intense competition with each other to produce a better, less expensive product or service are and always has been good for the economy of any country. When businesses are allowed to become too big to fail, to hire trained gunslingers in the form of expensive lobbyists and contribute heavily to the campaigns of candidates who provide those businesses favors, privileges, subsidies, tax cuts, etc., they cease to be good for the economy of our country.
Business owners hate unions because it gets in the way of them making money. The ego maniacal business owner values profit above treating employees with dignity or as a human being at all. Forcing an employee to skip lunch is the difference between earning $100 to $0.00. Unions are hated because they force business owners to do the right thing. Sometimes what is right keeps them from maximizing their profits. There are labor laws, however can be ignored when greed is involved. Most employers get away with it as opposed to employers who have employees with unions.
hope that helps...</span>