Answer:
1. Does not extend to propaganda for war
2. Everyone has the right, peacefully and unarmed, to assemble, to demonstrate, to picket and to present petitions
3. Everyone has the right to freedom of association
Answer: skin cancer
Explanation: Carcinogens may be defined as substances which are capable of inducing the development of cancerous cells in living tissue. The students described in the scenario, were of the opinion that subjecting frogs in a smoke filled environment fro a prolonged period will result in the development of lung cancer in the frog. The hypothesis might have stemmed from the thought of the risk in which smokers are very liable of being victims of cancerous cells. However, exposing frogs to such will not result in them developing lung cancer. However, carcinogens such as asbestos, vinyl chloride, benzene, nickel and so one have large tendency of resulting in skin cancer when exposed to air.
Answer:
the 24-hour time period
Explanation:
A day can be determined in many ways, but the most correct and comprehensive way is to state that one day corresponds to the 24-hour period between sunrise and sunset. A day can also be defined as the period of time when sunlight is visible, that is, the period when one side of the earth is completely facing the sun.
The Treaty of Paris marked the end of the Revolutionary War. This was a peace treaty signed in Paris between Great Britain and America.
None of these conclusions is valid.
- The first one implies that people either think that their employer should cover part of the health insurance costs (as said in the original sentence), or they think that the employer should pay 100%. This is not correct because there are other possible opinions people can have, like thinking that the employer shouldn't pay for anything, for example.
- The second conclusion is invalid for the same reason: it implies that people can only either think that the employer should pay a large part, or that the employer shouldn't pay anything. It is not considering other options.
- The third conclusion does not work either because it is referring to what people think about <em>the amount </em>of the costs themselves, whereas the original topic was <em>how</em> they are paid for.
