<em>Hey There!!</em>
<em>I think the best answer is:</em>
<em>C. </em><em>Both regions exported mostly food products.</em>
<em>Because, They grew crops such as wheat, oats and barley. Similar to New England colonies, the Middle colonies also flourished in trade of major items like iron and furs. When comparing both New England and Middle Colonies, both utilized forms of self-government.</em>
<em>P.S </em><em>Tell me if this wrong....</em>
<em />
<em />
<em>#</em>
<em> </em>
<em />
<em>#</em>
<em> </em>
<em />
<em />
<em />
Answer:
The monkeys were more attached to the artificial mothers that were warm and soft.
Explanation:
Since monkeys are considered to one of the closest primate to humans, harry Harlow intended to gather information regarding parent-child relations among humans by studying how other primates would behave under similar situation.
The monkeys were more attached to the artificial mothers that were warm and soft indicates that emotional bonding between children and parents in primates starts from early age. Warm and Soft atmosphere provided a sense of comfort for the children that later turned into long time affection to their parents.
This question is incomplete, here's the complete question.
See attached venn diagram.
How many women at the party are under 30?
How many men at the party are not under 30?
How many women are at the party? How many people are at the party?
Answer:
- 16 women under 30
- 22 men not under 30
- 44 women at the party
- 81 people at the party
Explanation:
A Venn diagram has overlapping circles, each one containing all the components of a group. Where the circles
The overlap reveals the elements that different groups have in common.
Total of people at the party:
22 men not under 30
+
15 men under 30
+
16 women under 30
+
28 not men, nor under 30
Total = 81 people at the party
If there are 22 men not under 30, and 15 men under 30, it means there´re 37 men and 44 women at the party.
The Mexican-American War, waged between the United States and Mexico from 1846 to 1848, helped to fulfill America's "manifest destiny" to expand its territory across the entire North American continent.
Answer:
Through the diverse cases represented in this collection, we model the different functions that the civic imagination performs. For the moment, we define civic imagination as the capacity to imagine alternatives to current cultural, social, political, or economic conditions; one cannot change the world without imagining what a better world might look like.
Beyond that, the civic imagination requires and is realized through the ability to imagine the process of change, to see one’s self as a civic agent capable of making change, to feel solidarity with others whose perspectives and experiences are different than one’s own, to join a larger collective with shared interests, and to bring imaginative dimensions to real world spaces and places.
Research on the civic imagination explores the political consequences of cultural representations and the cultural roots of political participation. This definition consolidates ideas from various accounts of the public imagination, the political imagination, the radical imagination, the pragmatic imagination, creative insurgency or public fantasy.
In some cases, the civic imagination is grounded in beliefs about how the system actually works, but we have a more expansive understanding stressing the capacity to imagine alternatives, even if those alternatives tap the fantastic. Too often, focusing on contemporary problems makes it impossible to see beyond immediate constraints.
This tunnel vision perpetuates the status quo, and innovative voices —especially those from the margins — are shot down before they can be heard.