Answer:
b. supply is represented graphically by a curve and quantity supplied as a point on that curve.
Explanation:
Qunatity supplied shows how qunatity of a product changes in response to changes in price of that good. According to the law of supply, the higher the price of good, the higher the quantity supplied and the lower the price of a good, the lower the quantity supplied. This shows that quantity supplied has a direct relationship with price.
Changes in quantity supplied is shown by movement along a supply curve.
Changes in supply is caused by other factors other than changes in price. Some of these factors are :
Changes in price of similar goods
Tax
Change in number of suppliers
Technological advancement
Changes in supply is shown by movement of the supply curve either to the left or to the right and not a movement along the supply curve.
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
In the given context, the correct definition for an employee, would be that of an individual who executes orders to buy and sell for clients of his or her brokerage firm.
Explanation:
An employee is a person who is hired by an employer to execute functions that are necessary to his organization's full operation. In the context of the stockmarket, an employee of a company would not trade for his or her account, but for his employer's account, following their policies and intentions. Therefore, an employee is an individual who executes orders to buy and sell for clients of his or her brokerage firm.
Answer:
Predatory pricing.
Explanation:
When Lofonift Inc. introduced its flagship product, an MP3 player, it captured the MP3 player market by offering its product at the lowest price in the market. This gradually forced many of its competitors out of business. Once its competitors were out of business, Lofonift Inc. raised its prices. In this scenario, Lofonift Inc. most likely indulged in predatory pricing.
Predatory pricing is a strategy used by some business owners to reduce the cost of a particular commodity or item to the lowest possible amount such that the available competitors will be driven out of business.
Answer:
The answer to this question is A
Answer:
Oral contracts regarding the sale of real property are enforceable under the Statute of Frauds.
Explanation:
Another thing that supports Donna's case is that she spent money, time and possibly others resources remodeling the house because she relied on the validity of the oral contract.
