Answer:
A would make sense
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
There is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 1432
p = 23% = 0.23
Alpha, α = 0.05
Number of theft complaints , x = 321
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
This is a one-tailed test.
Formula:
Putting the values, we get,
Now, we calculate the p-value from the table.
P-value = 0.298
Since the p-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and accept the null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
Thus, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
Answer:
$1161
Step-by-step explanation:
21.5% of 5400 is 1161.
Area of circle = pi r²
14²= 196
196 x pi = 196pi
Area = 196pi units²
Radius = 3 m
Cylinder Volume =<span> </span><span>π <span>• r² • height
</span></span>
Cylinder Volume =<span> 3.14159 * 3^2 * 5
</span><span><span><span>Cylinder Volume =<span> </span>141.372
</span></span></span>OR PI * 45