Answer:
The withdraw amount is "11,227.42".
Explanation:
The given values are:
In stock account,
PMT = $820
Interest rate = 
N = 300
PV = 0
In Bond account,
PMT = $420
Interest rate = 
N = 300
PV = 0
Now,
By using the FV (Future value) function, the value in Stock account will be:
= ![FV(rate,nper,pmt,[pv],[type])](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=FV%28rate%2Cnper%2Cpmt%2C%5Bpv%5D%2C%5Btype%5D%29)
= 
By using the FV (Future value) function, the value in Stock account will be:
=
= 
After 25 years,
The value throughout the account, will be:
= 
= 
By using the PMT function, we can find the with drawling amount. The amount will be:
= ![PMT(rate, nper, pv, [fv], [type])](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=PMT%28rate%2C%20nper%2C%20pv%2C%20%5Bfv%5D%2C%20%5Btype%5D%29)
= 
Answer:
b. $14,939
Explanation:
Property placed in service in 1st year:
Amount $
2nd quarter 15,000
3rd quarter 6,000
4th quarter <u>40,000</u>
Total furnishing at beginning of 2nd Year $61,000
Half Year depreciation rate in 2nd Year as per Macrs table under "7 years life" assets, the applicable depreciation in the 2nd year is 24.49%
Thus, amount of depreciation expense is allowable in the current (second) year of ownership = $61,000 * 24.49% = $14938.90
The inverse relationship between price and quantity demanded can be graphically illustrated by <u>a downward sloping curve.</u> Therefore, Option D is the correct statement.
<u />
<h3>What is the relationship between price and quantity?</h3>
<u />
The law of supply and demand is a keystone of present-day economics. According to this theory, the price of a good is inversely associated with the quantity offered.
This makes the experience for plenty of goods because the more high-priced it becomes, much fewer people could be capable of affording it and the demand will finally drop.
Therefore, The inverse relationship between price and quantity demanded can be graphically illustrated by <u>a downward sloping curve.</u> Option D is the correct statement.
learn more about law of demand:
brainly.com/question/10782448
#SPJ1
Answer:
threat of new entrants.
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that the competitive force involved in this situation is the threat of new entrants. This refers to the risk that existing companies in a market face of new competitors entering the market and overtaking their market share, eventually forcing them out of the market. Which tends to happen more when a market is expected to grow drastically in the near future as new companies want to take advantage of the opportunity such as is expected to happen in this scenario.
If this is a true or false question, then the answer is definitely true.
This definition you wrote above does indeed refer to constructive receipt. It is used to determine whether a tax payer has received a gross income and whether and when he or she should pay their taxes, as well as to calculate how much they are supposed to pay.
