The answer is: a newspaper article describing reduced crime rates in cities with teen curfews.
This piece of evidence would best support an argument in favor of a teen curfew because it is based in facts, not opinions, and it shows that other places that have established teen curfews have had positive results because of it. Therefore, there is evidence to asume the possibility that if teen curfew is established in other cities, it would get the same positive results.
An onlilne poll of comunity members and an interview with a parent would serve as evidence when studying how the community feels about teen curfew but not as evidence in an argument in favor of teen curfew because the data would be biased.
Answer: Artifacts
Explanation:
Artifacts are the components that are disrupt the external validity or internal validity of result in any research.Artifacts tend to modify or change the authenticity of participant and equipment involved in research field with their presence.
Impact of artifacts can also be influential to understand the process through observing evidences. They impact evidences, documents,tools, equipment, etc.
Definitely B. So other drivers can see you. A and C both don’t make sense
The answer is B, because it does create all the types of courts that may exist in any state of the nation
Answer
Operational Communications center capability
Explanation:
Operational Communications center capability includes guaranteeing the limit with respect to convenient interchanges on the side of security, situational mindfulness, and activities by any methods accessible, among and between influenced networks in the effect territory and all reaction powers.
So Operational Communications center capability will be the right answer
