Answer:
Gemma gets 3 biscuits
Zak gets 18 biscuits
Step-by-step explanation:
1:6 = 1+6
= 7
1/7 * 21 = 3
6/7 * 21 = 18
Answer:
The answer is most likely -1 31/33
I have a hard time with fractions so I usually just go into my calculator and change it to a decimal. For example with -5 1/3 I would insert 1/3 into my calculator to change it to a decimal and then simply tack on the -5 to it. So in decimal form 1/3 is 0.333... so with the -5 added on its -5.333... Do the same for the other number and then divide. You will get -1.9393... all you have to do is go into your calculator and try out 11/12 or 31/33 to see which equals 0.9393... because those are the only options with a -1. In this case 31/33 equals 0.9393 s -1 31/33 is the answer
The ratio is 12:28. Or in fraction form it’s 12/28. You can also simplify it to 3/7
Answer:
Null hypothesis: ∪ = No possible child abuse or neglect
Alternative hypothesis: Uₐ = Possible child abuse or neglect
Step-by-step explanation:
Null hypothesis: ∪ = No possible child abuse or neglect
Alternative hypothesis: Uₐ = Possible child abuse or neglect
A type I error occurs when you reject the null hypothesis when it is true. In this situation, a type I error occurs when you conclude on possible child neglect or abuse and place the child in protective custody
A type II error occurs when you accept the null hypothesis when it is false. In this instance, a type II error occurs when you conclude on no possible child abuse or neglect when there is and fail to remove the child from the home.
In this case, the type II error is the more serious error. Failure to remove the child when there is possible child abuse or neglect will lead to more detrimental effect. Although, the type I error is also serious, it is not so detrimental as the type II error.
Answer:
See below
Step-by-step explanation:
r/6 <-6 multiply both sides by 6 to get
<u>r < - 36 </u>
<u />
<u> or</u> 4r+2 > 18 subtract 2 from both sides of the equation
4r > 16 divide both sides by 4
<u> r > 4 </u>
