From the narration, we can conclude that Rainsford is adventurous and knowledgeable about the outdoors.
<h3>Why is this conclusion possible?</h3>
- Because Rainsford can get a sense of the time by looking at the position of the sun.
- Because he proves to be a connoisseur of the environment.
- Because when he sees that he is in the environment, he is happy.
Rainsford is a hunter and spends a lot of time in the wild, going on adventures and exploring open areas. For this reason, he was happy to realize that he was in a natural environment because he knew how these environments work and could act more safely.
Learn more about Rainsford:
brainly.com/question/2463154
#SPJ1
It’s B because it doesn’t really describe anything. Let me know if it’s wrong though.
In a simple sentence, it only consist of a single or compound subject and a single or compound predicate and conveys a complete thought. Therefore, in a simple sentence, there is only ONE independent clause. The answer for this, therefore, would be option D. Hope this answers your question.
Answer:
Rebecca stumbles and explains her unsteadiness is from not having eaten. Why does she explain her weakness? Rebecca attributes her stumble to weakness from hunger because she does not want anyone to interpret her unsteadiness as spiritual weakness or fear of facing death.
