Answer:
This statement is True. Physical evidence is seen as more objective.
Explanation:
Witness opinions are considered subjective accounts and they can be subject to bias and inaccuracies so they are seen as less concrete and reliable as evidence. It builds a stronger case against a defendant if the prosecution can provide physical evidence that a crime or wrongdoing occurred. Another related term is circumstantial evidence which would imply that someone might be guilty of a crime without the physical proof, like being caught holding a gun at a crime scene for instance. The circumstantial evidence would be being seen holding the gun; the physical evidence would be proof the bullets came from the gun.
Are there answer choices?
<span>the thing that supremacy clause do is: making the federal constitution and federal laws take priority over states' law and consitution
In the event when federal laws and state laws contradict each other, the courts are obliged to held the federal law as a higher standard for the current case </span>
The Han controlled territories that are not part of modern china Vietnam and Korea are the two present day countries south and northeast of china that were controlled by this dynasty
Answer:
civil case begins when a person or entity (such as a corporation or the government), called the plaintiff, claims that another person or entity (the defendant) has failed to carry out a legal duty owed to the plaintiff.
Explanation:
please give brainiest! hope this helps!
