Answer:
In the statements prior to the given statement, the author makes their opinion clear. The introductory sentence states, "How can a human being with any claim to a sense of moral responsibility deliberately let loose an instrument of destruction." Off of this statement alone, it is evident that the author strongly questions the morality and ethicalness of dropping a nuclear bomb. It goes on to state "This is not war: . . . this is pure nihilism."
Thus when the author states "strikes at the very basis of moral existence?" they strongly believe that dropping a nuclear bomb is immoral and unethical, they question the meaning of being human if "the very foundations or morality are overthrown" by dropping a nuclear bomb.
I hope this helps.
Answer:
the republic party dominated in New England New York and the northern Midwest had a strong present in the rest of the North. it almost had no support in the south where it was roundly denounced in 1856-1960 Francine diverse force that threatened civil war.
Explanation:
good luck:) there you go
Answer: President
https://www.google.com/search?q=branches+of+government&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS794US801&sxsrf=ALeKk008rxaVGSe-InXFFJvhalNwB0gbvQ:1586306115145&tbm=isch&source=iu&ictx=1&fir=78oUbwEmZBKfkM%253A%252C8Gzxh6ZjvasbIM%252C_&vet=1&usg=AI4_-kQo6LCjnIL-MoudkQQYE_YkM_4Txg&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiC4v3jytfoAhUFup4KHQYgA-IQ_h0wAHoECAQQBA#imgrc=78oUbwEmZBKfkM:
"<span>The rejection of the Olive Branch Petition" would be the best option, since this was submitted to Britain before the Declaration in the hopes that the colonies would be able to prevent war but still have Britain address their grievances. </span>
Trading an item for another item
