In DNA the sugar used is called deoxyribose whereas in RNA the sugar is ribose (hence DNA and RNA). The important structural difference between the two types of RNA is that mRNA takes on the shape of a line whereas tRNA has a clover-like shape.
Having one theory is setting a limit on your potential and the potential of the overall theory and subject you are working on. Having multiple theories gives you a broader idea and perspective of what is going on, and even though one may slightly contradict the other, it is okay because that is what theories are for.
To the point, scientists usually have more than one theory so that they can gain a broader perspective on the matter and maybe even increase the chance of being correct on the matter.
Hope this was helpful.
Cheers,
DNA
Nucleic Acids are the basis for the storage and transmission of hereditary information in all cells. Determines a cell's function and manufactures proteins & enzymes. Encodes instructions for making proteins and RNA. DNA stores the “operating instructions” for a cell.
Answer:
A few obstacles would make it tough to accomplish this objective. In the first place, the polypeptide backbone is characteristically polar. Hardly any proteins would be dissolvable in a non-polar hydrocarbon. Moreover, to keep up the dissolvability of this protein, most of its amino acids would need to contain hydrophobic or non-polar R groups.
Then again, its charged or polar R groups would need to connect with one another or be covered in the core of the protein away from the hydrocarbon solvent. This would put noteworthy requirements on both the idea of the R groups and the structure of the protein that could take part in substrate recognition or catalysis. By and large, this is certainly not a reasonable objective.
