Answer:
price
Explanation:
It will be easy to provide an example to better illustrate this. Lets suppose that a patient has been diagnosed with cancer and is trying to figure which between chemotherapy or taking drugs is the best treatment. The question this cancer patient is going to ask herself is which among the two will prolong her life. Thus, survival time is the response variable. In our case, the price is the response variable because it is the determining factor of where these college students will live. Amenities somehow affect the price and thus, it will act as the response variable. Price is what we are able to measure and the location which is the students' primary interest lies in our response variable
Answer:
(1)<u> </u><u>B.</u> <em>They must be a resident of a US state</em>
(2) <u>D.</u> <em>To Ensure that one branch does not gain too much power</em>
(3) <u>A. </u><em>The US court of appeals in Washington, DC</em>
<em />
Answer:
This process is known as stratified random probability sampling.
Explanation:
Probability sampling is based in the fact that every member of the studied group has an equal probability of being chosen as a subject in the study and every member can be representative of such group. In probabilty sampling, the subjects of the sample are chosen randomly, but there are also different types of probability sampling.
Stratified random probability sampling involves dividing the population into groups and then choosing randomly within each group. Linda has divided her subjects into the ones that eat at the restaurant for breakfast, lunch or dinner, then she plans to choose randomly from those three groups. Therefore, she is using the process known as stratified random sampling.
Answer:
fundamental attribution error is considered an error because of the fundamental attribution error, we tend to believe that others do bad things because they are bad people. We’re inclined to ignore situational factors that might have played a role.
Explanation:
The fundamental attribution error is our tendency to explain someone's behavior based on internal factors, such as personality or disposition, and to underestimate the influence that external factors, such as situational influences, have on another person's behavior.
So, the fundamental attribution error explains why we often judge others harshly while letting ourselves off the hook at the same time by rationalizing our own unethical behavior.
