Answer:
B) upward communication
Explanation:
Upward Communication -
It refers to the flow of information from the lower level to the higher level in the company, is referred to as upward communication.
The method helps to pull out thought and innovative technique from all the employees working in the company , and is used for the betterment of the company.
It helps to have a healthy conversation and decision making process, which helps the company to grow.
Hence, from the question,
The company Munchkin takes idea from all the employees and tries to implement it into the company, thereby showcasing the method of upward communication.
When Men's Wearhouse fired a salesperson who wasn't sharing walk-in customer traffic, and total clothing sales volume among all salespeople increased significantly, the company reduced destructive internal competition.
<h3>What is a destructive competition?</h3>
- Multiple producers being driven out of the market by competition.
- When there are numerous manufacturers of a good, prices are frequently driven down to the point that nobody makes a profit, which is when destructive competition takes place.
<h3>What do you mean by internal competition?</h3>
- The aforementioned components are the foundation of our concept of internal competition, which is senior management-sanctioned duplication or overlap of activity within the firm's boundaries in an effort to resolve market or technology uncertainties.
<h3>Is competition is constructive or destructive?</h3>
- However, competition can really be divided into two types: healthy competition and unhealthy competition.
- Two competitors may work better together or may just cause mutual stress, similar to waves crashing into one another to create a larger wave.
Learn more about destructive internal competition here:
brainly.com/question/27911918
#SPJ4
Answer:
Ten pounds of chicken to trade for at least <u>40</u> pounds of vegetables but not more than<u> 50</u> pounds of vegetables
Explanation:
Vegetables Chicken Trade Off Ratio
John 40 10 4:1 (40/10) or 1:0.25 (10/40)
George 25 5 5:1 (25/5) or 1:0.20 (5/25)
John has comparative advantage in Chicken and George has comparative advantage in Veggies because :
- John's chicken opportunity cost, in veggies < George (4<5). George's veggies opportunity cost, in chicken < John (0.20<0.25).
- George is more (5X) productive in veggies than chicken, than John (4X). John is less unproductive in chicken than veggies (1/4th), compared to George (1/5th).
So, John will sell Chicken to George & George will sell veggies to John. Gains from trade are when each get trade ratio better than their their own trade off ratio.
- It implies: John gets >' 4 pounds veggies per chicken pound' and George gets > '0.20 pound chicken per veggie pound'.
- Unitary method:- '1chicken : 4veggies' = '10chickens : 40veggies' and '0.20chicken : 1veggie' = '10chickens : 50 veggies' .
