Answer and Explanation:
1. Business implication: if there are no trade barriers, it would enable them get better raw materials for their business and increase customer base
Legal anti trust implication: lobbying is illegal in some countries
2. Business implication: this would attract more manufacturers who were not previously members of the association which would in turn promote the goals of the association in improving trade amongst the manufacturers
Legal anti trust implication: associatio may be exposed to legal examination, example increased regulations
3 business implications:sales territories would invariably create a safe and secure investment for manufacturers such that there is less cost of marketing and campaigning as consumers are guaranteed
Legal implications: this is against anti trust laws and goes against free trade policies and illegal monopoly
4 business implications: boycotting this supplier could create an alternative source of raw materials which wouldn't be as efficient and even cost more
Legal implications: boycotting a large supplier such as this who might have a political backing might bring political retaliations from the supplier's political proxies who might create other regulations in the supplier's favour
Answer: Option B
Explanation: In simple words, commercial fitness facility refers to the gymnasiums an other such facility centers where individuals can go and work out for a better health and fitness. In house training refers to the knowledge that an employee gains while working for an organisation.
Employees working in such facility centers have the advantage to learn new techniques and exercises while working and getting paid. These facilities core operations relates to training their clients and making them more healthy thus they have to train their employees properly so they can handle the clients.
While doing so employee would get an in house training for the work that he or she is going to perform in the future,
Answer:
The tension between value creation and the pressure to keep costs in check.
Explanation: Strategic trade-off is the term used to describe the decision taken which led to the replacement of a particular Strategic action with another. Most Strategic trade-offs are usually done after considering the costs and benefits of the strategic plans or objectives being monitored or observed.
A STRATEGIC TRADE-OFF IS ALSO DONE IN ORDER TO ENSURE THAT THE TENSION BETWEEN VALUE CREATION AND THE PRESSURE TO KEEP COSTS IN CHECK IS OF IMPORTANCE TO AN ORGANISATION..
Answer: what are you asking for? can you specify your statement
Answer:
c.$212,000
Explanation:
The historical cost principle requires that assets are initially and continuously accounted for using the cost of purchase, also known as the historical cost of the asset.
The actual value of the asset is the net book value which is the difference between the historical cost and the accumulated depreciation of the asset
As such, using the historical cost of the asset, the value to be recorded is $212,000 being the purchase price of the asset.