Answer: Because Sweet Nothings is an expository piece of writing.
Explanation:
Kowalski, the author of Sweet Nothings presents evidence to support weight loss and refute weight loss because her writing is an expository piece of writing.
An expository piece of writing just as the name implies is one that exposes readers to a particular idea or topic. It’s purpose is to inform about and describe a particular subject or idea.
Kowalski, the author of Sweet Nothings may have been expected to stick to a particular side of the subject, that is either present evidence that supports weight loss or the one that refutes weight loss.
Instead, she presented both because her writing is an expository piece informing her readers about the both the advantages and disadvantages of weight loss.
The central idea in "A Genetics of Justice” surrounds the outcomes of the dictatorship and is described by the words lost their lives and slaughter. Thus, option a and e are correct.
<h3>What is the central idea?</h3>
A central idea is the main topic matter that the author wants the readers to understand. In Julia Alvarez's "A Genetics of Justice” the idea of dictatorship and its result is presented to the readers.
The phrases like, lost their lives and slaughter are the supporting details that describe the central idea of the dictatorship. As the result, the people were slaughtered in mass and killed.
Therefore, the loss of their lives and slaughter describe the central idea.
Learn more about "A Genetics of Justice" here:
brainly.com/question/27957507
#SPJ1
Answer:
Hi I was wondering if you had any more information to go along with this question so I could better understand the question.
Explanation:
"To some little actress or other."
??????????????????????????
