The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by the question is the third choice.
The notation "<span>AB (with line over) =4" is the equation that has the most correct notation.</span>
I hope my answer has come to your help. God bless and have a nice day ahead!
Answer:
<h2>Kelly is wrong, with this congruent parts, we can conclude that triangles are congruent.</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
To demonstrate congruent triangles, we need to use the proper postulates. There are at least 5 postulates we can use.
- Angle-Angle-Side Theorem (AAS theorem).
- Hypotenuse-Leg Theorem (HL theorem).
- Side-Side-Side Postulate (SSS postulate).
- Angle-Side-Angle Postulate (ASA postulate).
- Side-Angle-Side Postulate (SAS postulate).
In this case, Kelly SAS postulate, because the corresponding sides-angles-sides are congruent, i.e., KL ≅ MN and LM ≅ KN, also, all corresponding angles are congruent.
So, as you can see, only using SAS postulate, the congruency can be demonstrated. (Refer to the image attached to see an example of SAS postulate)
Answer:
x < 3
Step-by-step explanation:
2(4+2x)>5x+5
Distribute
8 +4x > 5x+5
Subtract 4x from each side
8 +4x-4x > 5x-4x+5
8 > x+5
Subtract 5 from each side
8-5 > x+5-5
3 > x
X must be less than 3
Answer:
x = 24 makes the original equation true
Step-by-step explanation:
2 < x ≤ 24
2 < x signifies x cannot be equal to 2
x≤24 signifies x can be equal to 24.
Your answers:
10) (m+7)(m+8) 11) (b-10)(b+2)
12) (k-4)(k+10) 13) (n-9)(n-8)
14) (7r+3)(r-2) 15) (5a+6)(a+2)
Hope it helps