Leadership is not needed when:
- It will make processes inefficient due to time wasting
- It is being used to oppress people
- Subordinates don't need leadership
Leadership is usually quite good as it can galvanize subordinates to be better workers due to better organization as well as inspiration.
There are instances where it is not needed however such as when:
- It slows down processes - sometimes leaders will need to give permission for a subordinate to do something. If this thing is time conscious and the leader is not available to give their ascent, the whole process could suffer.
- It oppresses people - when a leader is an oppressive one and acts in such a way that their subordinates suffer, that leadership is not needed.
- Subordinates are fine without it - sometimes workers have the necessary skills and experience to operate independently without a leader. In such a case, a leader is not needed.
In conclusion, while a leader is quite important in many ways, there can be situations where it is best that they are not used.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/24150490.</em>
Answer:
$5, 200 bushels of wheat
Explanation:
From the diagram the price support was at $6 per bushel, however if the government removes the price support or if there was no price support, then the price of the wheat will be $5 for a bushel. And in order to maintain the price support, from the diagram below, it is expected that the government would have to purchase 200 bushels of wheat.
Answer:
a. (1) make the plan, then (2) carry out the plan.
Explanation:
The cycle of the planning/ control comprises of following steps
1. Make the plan
2. After that carry out the plan
3. Now the control is there by comparing
4. And finally, the control could be taken by taking corrective actions
According to the given situation, the correct option is a
And, the rest of the options are wrong
