Answer:
The individual will plan to spend or consume more of his wages than usual; since he believes there'll be a tax cut.
Explanation:
C = consumption
W = wages
Note: No graph is attached to the question so we can't make use of certain information in the question.
Suppose there is an announced change in tax policy - a tax cut/reduction - and a tax increase later; <em>what is the impact of this policy on consumption if the consumer believes that the policy will be implemented?</em>
<em />
Reasoning as an economist, the first reaction of a rational consumer is to begin to consume more since he believes the tax reduction policy will be implemented.
NOTE that sometimes the government or financial ministry in a country intentionally announce policies just so citizens can begin adjusting their consumption and investment patterns in line with them. They do not necessarily follow up with implementation of the policies.
So for a consumer who believes that there'll be a tax cut, he'll be excited and will either consume more of his present wage or consume all and borrow or dissave.
Answer:
The usefulness benefits that a consumer receives from buying and using products or services is called utility... so it's B). ♡ hope this helps ♡
Answer:
-D
Explanation:
I'm pretty sure it's zooming in or out on the document
Answer:
The net income will increase by $6,712 if the subcomponent is purchased.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Swifty Corporation incurs the following costs to produce 9900 units of a subcomponent:
Direct materials $8316
Direct labor 11187
Variable overhead 12474
Fixed overhead 16200
Total cost= $48,177
An outside supplier has offered to sell Swifty the subcomponent for $2.85 a unit.
Swifty could avoid $3000 of fixed overhead by accepting the offer.
We need to calculate the total cost of buying the subcomponent:
Buy:
Total cost= 9,900*2.85 + (16,200 - 3,000)= $41,415
The net income will increase by $6,712 if the subcomponent is purchased.
Answer:
C. The Cassies will win.
Explanation:
In the given case, the cassies would win as this was appraisal fraud that done by the company employee who is a Bank of america Subsidiary. Here the loan broker and the appraiser increase the fair market value of cassies home i.e. $620,000 but it would be lesser that is $250,000. So this inflate the value in order to make the payment of high rate with related to the mortgage
