Answer:
Place a filled in dot on the 8 and make a line to the right.
Step-by-step explanation:
hope this helps you :)
<h3>
Answer: k = 7</h3>
======================================================
Explanation:
There are probably a number of ways to approach this problem, but row reduction was the only method I could think of at the moment.
If you were to follow the steps shown in the attached image, then you'll be on the process of applying row reduction. The last step in that diagram isn't in full REF (row echelon form), but that doesn't technically matter.
What does matter is the 2k-14 entry in the bottom row. If that entry was 0, while the entry just to the right of it was nonzero, then this would lead the entire system of equations to be inconsistent. This is because the bottom equation would be in the form 0x+0y+0z = m, where m is some nonzero constant. As you can see, that equation would simplify to 0 = m; however, m is nonzero, so we have a contradiction.
If 2k - 14 were 0, then
2k - 14 = 0
2k = 14
k = 14/2
k = 7
This is the only k value in which the system is inconsistent. In other words, the system wouldn't have any solutions with this k value. You can verify this through completing the row reduction with k = 7 (it should be far easier now that we can nail down a fixed k value) and find that you'll get a contradiction. You could also use substitution to find an inconsistency would arise when k = 7.
Side notes:
- You don't need to do full RREF, though you can if you want. REF should be sufficient.
- I drew each matrix as a grid of boxes to help separate the terms. This is also done to space out each step. Usually those grid lines aren't present.
Hi there, so we know that all triangles add up to 180 degrees so we will take 38 and add it with 25 to get 63 then we subtract 180 by 63 to get 117 which is your awnser!! I mean I might be wrong but I’m probably right. I hope this helps!! Have a great morning, night, or day, Whatever it is for you!
Answer:
Doubling the actual answer and increasing it by 2.
Step-by-step explanation:
The calculator is returning 26, instead of 12. Note that 26 is 2 more than twice of 12.
i.e.
26 = 2(12) + 2
Calculator is returning 32 instead of 15. Here again we can note the same logic. 32 is 2 more than twice of 15.
i.e.
32 = 2(15) + 2
Calculator returns 202 instead of 100. Here again the same logic holds true.
i.e.
202 = 2(100) + 2
So, what the calculator is doing is:
Doubling the actual result and increasing it by 2.