The most problematic feature of this argument is that the adults who are persons now were not persons when they were fetuses because fetuses have no consciousness, no reasoning, and no self-awareness; in addition, even if someone argues that a fetus has the right to live, the fetus’ right to live can never outweigh the right of the woman who conceived it and wishes to abort it.
A weak analogy is a fallacy -statement given with no proven support- in which individuals compare their ideas to others to justify their thoughts as correct but in most of cases the comparisons are mistaken or vague and were selected by those individuals so that others could accept their beliefs.
In the example, <em>fetuses are compared to human beings in the attempt to support that if killing humans is penalized so it should be killing fetuses. Though, the topic of abortion is more complex than that. The conditions under which the pregnant woman got pregnant are diverse and should be analyzed carefully and in deep.</em>
When there is no definite information or any existing knowledge that can be used to reason that a thing is right or wrong but still someone feels like the action or deed is not right and their conscience is telling them that it’s wrong then in terms of ethical beliefs it is called intuition. Intuition is often considered to be an opposite of conscious reasoning however, there are a number of other different meanings of conscious intuition and in simple words it is often refereed to as a feeling of something is wrong or gut feeling.
Explanation: Knowledge comes through experience, how we relate to things, how observant we are to things about us, how we tend to interact with people will always determine how we know things. So yes logically what we know is as a result of how we relate and interact we people and things around us.
