the answer is Eulb. that is blue spelled backwards
Answer:
A. Float plan
Explanation:
A float plan can be defined as a written statement containing the details about an intended boat trip which is filed with a friend, siblings, or relatives.
Generally, float plan is a collection of details about your boat, number of people on board (crew and passengers), a safety equipment being used, expected or intended destination, and when you expect to get there.
Hence, before a long outing on the water, you should leave a float plan with your friend or relative.
The purpose of having a float plan is to assist the search and rescue personnel in locating victims in the event of a boat accident, mishap or emergency.
<em>In a nutshell, a float plan is a life saving document which is used to locate victims in the shortest possible time during a boat emergency. </em>
Answer:
The major premise is lack of House to pay attention towards the road ahead of him and the rule of contributory negligence. By using this jurisdiction, the plaintiff's damages will be reduced.
Explanation:
- The defendant driver, while he may ultimately be liable if all of the witnesses say he ran the stop sign, will raise the comparative fault of House for failing to keep a proper lookout and failing to take evasive action to avoid a collision.
- The defenses are the same as they would be if the collision was with another car instead of a bicycle.
- House had an ordinary duty to pay attention to the road ahead of him and keep himself and others safe.
- By watching his books and not the traffic, he breached that duty.
- I'm not saying that defense will be successful, but that's what would be alleged by the car's driver as a defense.
- In most states, the damages to the plaintiff will be reduced by the percentage of his/her comparative fault (also known in some jurisdictions as contributory negligence).
- In some states, if the plaintiff's comparative fault is shown to be over 50%, there will be no recovery at all.
Answer:
C.
Explanation:
I believe that they should recive up to 5 years in prision or 5,000 dollar fine.
December 15, 1971
Explanation:
the right of the people to be secure in their persons,houses,papers,effects,against unreasonable searches and seizures,shall not be violated,and no warranrs shall issue, but upon probable cause,supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched
