Answer:
The diffusion referred to in the question above is called Stimulus Diffusion.
This refers to the transmission of an idea or culture from it's original demography to another and then changes in the way it is being practised or is adopted in a different way in the new region.
Explanation:
In The Lorax, which is a children's book written by Dr Seuss and first published in the late nineteenth century. In the book, the author speaks to economic and industrial issues as it affects the environment.
The Onceler in the Lorax used to be an agent of environmental destruction and tells his tale from a point of regret. It is in the course of telling the story of how he masterminded the destruction of the environment in the valley that once contained a forest of Truffula trees and a range of animals that he mentions how his idea diffused into the valley.
Where he came from people wore Thneeds and they wore in around their necks. In the valley, they didn't. Nobody knew what a Thneed was. He relocated to the valley because of what he thought was a business opportunity: Demand for Thneeds. He then tries to sell the Thneed which was made out of the Truffula trees but the people of the valley were not interested.
After several attempts at sales of Thneed, he gives up and throws the Thneed away. Just then, it hits a girl who starts to wear it as a hat. Somehow, people take a liking to the Thneed as worn by the girl and they all rush to the Onceler to make one for them.
So in the above, narrative, we see a Stimulus Diffusion of an idea or culture. The Thneed was a new idea which got diffused into the culture of the people of the valley. Not only that, but they also changed the way the Thneed was being used where the Onceler came from.
Cheers!
Answer:
it think A if not its probably D
sorry if im wrong
You would be forgiven for thinking that Princess Diana had very little in common with Henry VIII or the artist Hans Holbein. But you would be wrong. The Tudors invented the portrait as a means of projecting personality, often by linking striking images with words.
If you look at any member of the Royal family in the last few hundred years capable of playing the same game, it’s the late Princess of Wales, posing alone in front of the Taj Mahal, anticipating the headlines.
In the first episode of a new series, The Genius of British Art, I will be examining how royal portraiture has reflected and defined the changing face of England. Five other presenters, including Jon Snow and Sir Roy Strong, will then explore other areas of our artistic heritage, from war art to landscapes.
In so many ways, the Tudor reign was transformative, and art is no exception. In 16th-century England, the idea of using a painting to capture and transmit the personality of a ruler was revolutionary. Until then, royal portraits consisted of a squiggle and a crown on a coin or a seal – they were merely tokens. But if you look at Hans Holbein’s 1537 portrait of Henry VIII, what you see is the man himself: there are no royal emblems, no crown, no flummery. The painting shows the King in all his thuggish dignity, a rugger player gone to seed. While paint can flatter or lie, steel in the form of a made-to-measure suit of armour with a 54-inch waist cannot. It’s clear from Henry’s surviving armour that the painting shows his actual, hulking physique.
There were two factors which drove this transformation of the portrait. One was the Renaissance: English artists and thinkers were influenced by continental Europe’s urge to recreate the lavish, realistic art of Rome. The second was the Reformation. The idea of English identity was invented in Henry’s reign after the break from the Catholic Church and Rome; you could say that he was the first Eurosceptic.
Answer: C
Explanation: I took a test with this question and got it right.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
US citizens by birth or naturalization cannot be deported. If they commit a criminal offense, all due process takes place within the country's legal framework.
