Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that a dairy scientist is testing a new feed additive. She chooses 13 cows at random from a large population of cows. She randomly assigns nold = 8 to get the old diet, and nnew = 5 to get the new diet including the additive.
From the data given we get the following
N Mean StDev SE Mean
Sample 1 8 43 5.1824 1.832
Sample 2 5 73 21.0832 9.429
df = 11
Std dev for difference = 13.3689
a) Yes the two are independent. The two sets of cows randomly chosen are definitely independent. Paired means equal number should be there and homogeneous conditions should be maintained.
b) Enclosed
c) Comparison of two means is the test recommended here. Because independent samples are used.\
d) Test statistic= -3.1233
(because of unequal variances we use that method)
95% confidence interval = ( -56.6676 , -3.3324 )
p value <0.05 our alpha
So reject null hypothesis.
The two means are statistically significantly different.
180-this number or 360 because its a circumference
8 ÷ 544 = 0.0147058824, 544 ÷ 8 = 68
Answer:
6 Years
Step-by-step explanation:
Orlando invests $1000 at 6% annual interest compounded daily.
Orlando's investment = 
Bernadette invests $1000 at 7% simple interest.
Bernadette's investment = A = 1000(1+0.07×t)
By trail and error method we will use t = 5
Bernadette's investment will be after 5 years
1000(1 + 0.07 × 5)
= 1000(1 + 0.35)
= 1000 × 1.35
= $1350
Orlando's investment after 5 years
= 
= 
= 1000(1.349826)
= 1349.825527 ≈ $1349.83
After 5 years Orlando's investment will not be more than Bernadette's.
Therefore, when we use t = 6
After 6 years Orlando's investment will be = $1433.29
and Bernadette's investment will be = $1420
So, after 6 whole years Orlando's investment will be worth more than Bernadette's investment.
Answer:
In order of least money saved to most money saved: Katrina, Susan, Gabrielle, Savanna
Step-by-step explanation:
You can first change all of them to either percentages or fractions with the same denominator. I chose to use percentages. Thus Savanna's percentage of money saved would be 90%, Katrina would've saved 80% and Susan would've saved around 83%.
From here you just order from least to greatest.
