Answer:
Multiplier effect in the 4th round = 3.58
Explanation:
A change in aggregate demand can create a much greater impact in the equilibrium national income. This is known as the multiplier effect. This occurs when injections of new demand for goods and services into the circular flow of income creates further rounds of spending. For example, if the government spending was on building new affordable houses then the need for housing materials will create demand for wood, cement and other housing supplies. Thus, these businesses will see a rise in sales. Whilst they benefit through profits, their employees would benefit from wages and salaries. As their income rises, they will spend it in the economy, and so will the businesses from their profits. This additional rounds of spending is the multiplier effect.
If a 100 increase creates 33 for the second round, it is 33% (33/100 x 100) i.e. 100 x 33% = 33
This is proven since 33 x 33% = 10.89 in the third round.
Hence, the multiplier effect in the forth round = 10.89 x 33% = 3.58
Answer:
Annual Rate of Return = 12%
Effective Annual Rate of Return = 9.6%
Explanation:
Nominal Annual Rate of return = 
Annual Dividend per share = $3 per quarter 
4 = $12 per share
Current price per share = $125
Par Price per share = $100
Thus Annual Rate of return = $12/$100 = 12%
Effective Annual Rate of Return = 
= 
= 9.6%
Final Answer
Annual Rate of Return = 12%
Effective Annual Rate of Return = 9.6%
Answer: a. less than the socially optimal price, greater than the socially optimal quantity
Explanation:
The steel mill is producing steel and selling at a rate that does not account for the pollution that it is causing. Because of this, it is selling at a lower equilibrium price than what it would had the Pollution been accounted for.
The Steel Mill is also selling quantity that is greater than what would be considered socially optimal because the socially optimal level would account for the pollution and adjust in such a way that the Pollution is minimized
Answer:
10.29%
Explanation:
Rule of 72 can be defined as a metric used to determine the time it will take to double an investment based on its growth rate.
To find the interest rate Kari must receive for her investment to double in 7 years, we would use the Rule of 72;
Rule of 72 = 72/7
Rule of 72 = 10.29%
Therefore, Kari must receive an interest rate of 10.29% for her investment to double in 7 years.
The answer could be any of these. This is not a fair question.
I believe that question is trying to get you to lean towards answer C because theoretically your family would know your character better than a bank might.
