The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Supreme Court Justice Holmes once included this statement in a majority opinion: "During wartime, utterances tolerable in peacetime can be punished." This statement informed the Supreme Court's later decisions on freedom of speech in that in times of war, citizens are not allowed to express comments or critics that could compromise the national security of the country. So in this case, freedom of speech could be suppressed during the time of war.
In the past, there had been incidents that could have compromised the strategy of the war due to some espionage activities. That is why the federal government has to be cautious with the information that is shared during war times.
Answer:
(a)The congress could pass a bill by stopping medications of life-or death from being increased to a particular value, thereby making Mylan to reduce their prices, to a more tangible value (b) If the president is not part of this decision, he can use his veto powers against the bill passed by the congress, thereby making Mylan to retain their rates as high as it is currently (c) Lobbyist and Interest groups will further express their ideas towards the president and congressmen to hold on, or make a change in the bill.
Explanation:
Solution:
(a) Congress could pass a bill by stopping important life-or-death medications from being added up above a certain value. in doing so,Mylan would be made to lower their prices to a more sensible value.
(b) If the President is not in approval of this sort of law making, he can use the power of veto towards the bill passed by Congress, in doing so Mylan can keep their rates as high as present as it is now. As a result, the power of Congress is weakened by the President's own power.
(c) For them to push their ideas forward, many lobbyists and interest groups would likely meet with the president and congressmen encouraging them to either or hold firm or make a change in their position on the bill such as lobbying several organizations that fight for the right of victims would urge congress to disallow a presidential veto of the bill this would mean that if they vote to override the veto, the bill becomes a law.
Answer:
Virgil explains how due to Beatrice desire´s he is in hell guiding Dante.
Explanation:
For Virgil the fact that Dante compares with Aeneas and Paul turns out to be hurtful, since the first was the inspiration in the poem of his composition as he was the founder of Rome, and the second was one of the saints of his great admiration to be The founder of the Church.
In this sonnet Dante expresses his feelings of fear and conviction; he believes that he will become the next Aeneas or Paul after passing through hell, he really thinks something relevant will happen after.
Given these statements by Dante, Virgil explains the reason for his stay and guidance for his passage in hell, he tells her how Beatrice was in charge of this feat, since thanks to her wishes and sacrifices for the love of Dante, Beatrice he asks Virgil to guide his way through that place.
For something to have value, it must have utility, or the capacity to be useful and provide satisfaction.
