Answer:
The natural resources of Australia include most famously coal, iron ore, and gold.
Explanation:
Yes, racism will exists probably till the world end and the world will never end so ofc racism still exicts and it will always exists
Chunking refers to the process of taking individual pieces of information and grouping them into larger units. By grouping each data point into a larger whole, you can improve the amount of information you can remember. Probably the most common example of chunking occurs in phone numbers
Chunking :
chunk reduces the load on WM via retrieval of a compact chunk representation from long-term memory that replaces the representations of individual elements of the chunk. This frees up capacity for subsequently encoded material.
What is organization memory strategy?
Organization is a memory strategy that involves grouping and relating material to maintain it in long-term memory.
What is chunking used for?
Chunking helps students identify key words and ideas, develops their ability to paraphrase, and makes it easier for them to organize and synthesize information
What is the chunking strategy?
Chunking is an example of a strategy that helps students breakdown difficult text into. more manageable pieces. Dividing content into smaller parts helps students identify key. words and ideas, develops students' ability to paraphrase, and makes it easier for. students to organize and synthesize information.
Learn more about memory strategy :
brainly.com/question/11376432
#SPJ4
.
A.) the others do not make sense. Have a great weekend!
Answer:
d. officers becoming personally involved with informants.
Explanation:
An informant is a person who gives his testimony in relation to a situation as a way to help in the investigation of something. These people cannot be considered a witness of a situation, because they are not formally obliged to speak the truth about the facts of the situation (the witness is obliged to speak the truth), and they can tell fanciful, uncooperative and incorrect information.
In this case, it is extremely unethical for the information that an informant provides to be overestimated, because that information may be false. moreover, an informant cannot be intimidated or coerced into contributing to a given situation, nor can he be deceived about its relevance in the investigation, through false praise. However, in terms of ethics and morals, nothing prevents officers from personally getting involved with informants.
