A thesis statement that would not be acceptable is <u>B. The </u><u>Chesapeake </u><u>and </u><u>New England colonies </u><u>developed into</u><u> two distinct societies </u><u>based on their </u><u>geography</u><u>, </u><u>reasons </u><u>for </u><u>founding</u><u>, </u><u>economic </u><u>characteristics, and </u><u>relationships </u><u>with </u><u>American Indians.</u>
You did not include the prompt in the question but the above should be the best answer.
The New England Colonies and the Chesapeake colonies were different in that:
- New England colonies were founded to escape religious persecution while the Chesapeake colonies were founded to make profit
- New England colonies engaged in shipping, food production and lumbering whereas the Chesapeake colonies focused on tobacco.
Even though they were different in the above regard, their treatment of Native Americans was the same as they both started off with peaceful relations with the Natives which eventually deteriorated into war.
We can therefore conclude that even though they differed in several ways, they did not differ in Native treatment which would make option B wrong.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/18193023.</em>
All of North, Central, and South America is completely west of the Prime Meridian. So the countries within the region are entirely in the western part of the Meridian. In Africa, Morocco, Senegal, and Guinea, all lie in the western part of the Meridian.
Germanic tribes such as the Franks, Ostragoths, Vandals and the Visigoths were surrounding it and weakening it by spreading into their territory, and also it was having internal governmental issues and struggles for consolidation of power.
The Chief Justice presides over president impeachment trails.
Answer:
Appellate courts review the procedures and the decisions in the trial court to make sure that the proceedings were fair and that the proper law was applied correctly.
Explanation:
So I suppose it would be C
