1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Zigmanuir [339]
3 years ago
5

Match the terms with their definitions. 1. to reduce the amount in blocks or sizeable amounts decimate 2. food and drink; necess

ary foods in order to stay alive city-states 3. The ancient power structures which were cities that were fortified into independent units of strength aristocratic 4. being of nobility or of a privileged upper-class sustenance
History
2 answers:
devlian [24]3 years ago
6 0

The answers to your question are,

1. To reduce the amount in blocks or sizable amounts - Decimate

2. Food and drink; necessary foods in order to stay alive - Sustenance

3. The ancient power structures which were cities that were fortified into independent units of strength -  City-States

4. Being into nobility or of a privileged upper-class - Aristocratic

-Mabel <3

saul85 [17]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

1. To reduce the amount in blocks or sizable amounts: Decimate

2. Food and drink; necessary foods in order to stay alive: Sustenance

3. The ancient power structures which were cities that were fortified into independent units of strength: City-States

4. Being of nobility or of a privileged upper-class: Aristocratic

Explanation:

These are the words that correctly match with the statements provided. To "decimate" means to reduce the amount of something by a large degree. This is a common word to use when talking about casualties of a war or conflict. "Sustenance" refers to food and drink that is required to survive. "City-states" are a form of political organization that was common in ancient times. Finally, "aristocratic" refers to something belonging to the upper-class of society.

You might be interested in
The Monroe Doctrine expressed the idea that new countries should be allowed to develop without interference from stronger nation
Archy [21]

Answer:

In my opinion, the United States does not follow this doctrine, although there are no longer any cases of "new countries" if there is the case of strong countries, including the United States, and developing or third world countries, as there are in Latin America, where the United States has been accused of intervening:

  1. Support the coup d'etat of Pinochet in Chile under the government of President Nixon in 1973.
  2. Orchestrate the coup against Jacobo Arbenz in Guatemala in 1984.
  3. Suppress protests in foreign countries as happened in Panama in 1964 under the mandate of President Johnson (APARICIO PINDADO, Daniel. 2016).

As well as the constant invasion of Middle Eastern countries in the search for nuclear weapons or terrorist groups that could threaten US sovereignty, as well as the recent friction with Iran.

Therefore, the inclusion of the United States as a strong country vis-à-vis other countries is undeniable and demonstrates that the Monroe doctrine (attributed to President James Monroe) is no longer applied by the country, at a time when more than ever countries should exercise their own government and be architects of its future.

Explanation:

The United States has been involved in different acts around the world that would suggest that the Monroe doctrine should only be applied when the country was a new or weak country, now that it is a strong country, it does not consider that doctrine applicable.

5 0
3 years ago
The "___"states gave up their western lands.
Irina18 [472]

Answer:

The correct answer is landed.

Explanation:

I did the assingment.

7 0
3 years ago
20 points
fenix001 [56]

Answer:

Explanation

Explanation:

when writing an expository peice, you are trying to explain something.

(EXP)ository : (EXP)lanation

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Benjamin Franklin was taken out of school when he was ten years old.<br><br> True<br> or<br> False
diamong [38]
False because it is false
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What brought the war in the Pacific to an end?
Svetradugi [14.3K]

Answer:

The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Explanation:

On August 8, the Soviet Union declared war on Japan and attacked the Japanese occupied Manchuria. After Japan agreed to surrender on August 14, 1945, American troops began to enter Japan. Japan officially surrendered to the United States, Great Britain, and the Soviet Union on September 2, 1945.

<h3> Hope it helps!</h3>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What started WWll???
    11·2 answers
  • Which statement best explains why the National Organization for Women included child care and maternity leave in their E
    9·1 answer
  • What ultimately led to burnside losing the battle of fredericksburg
    15·2 answers
  • Unalienable rights are best described as rights that -
    7·2 answers
  • How did haiti become independent
    12·1 answer
  • The Chola empire emerged in the southern part of India.<br><br> O True<br><br> O False
    11·1 answer
  • Why did Truman decide to drop the bomb in Japan?
    5·1 answer
  • What party left the wing protest
    7·1 answer
  • How did labor unions influence farmers?
    15·2 answers
  • HELP QUICK!!<br> How did the monarchs of Austria and Russia use their power as absolute rulers?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!