Answer:
I used the most recent figures of the international property rights index (year 2019), and the most recent GDP per capita estimamtes by the IMF in purchasing power parity. (year 2019)
Three countries with high scores, with GDP per capita (PPP):
- Finland - score of 8.712 - U$ 46.430
- Switzerland - score of 8.571 - U$ 64.649
- United States - score of 8.202 - U$ 62.606
Three countries with low scores, with GDP per capita (PPP):
- Ukraine - score of 4.432 - U$ 9.283
- Pakistan - score of 3.874 - U$ 5.680
- Haiti - score of 2.703 - U$ 1.864
The pattern that we find is that there is a strong correlation between the International Property Right Index scores and the GDP per capita figures. This is consistent with the findings in other similar rankings such as the Global Competitiveness Report, published by the World Economic Forum, and the Economic Freedom Index, published by the Heritage Foundation.
What can be interpreted is that property rights, and the strong enforcement of those property rights promote economic development and growth. This is because the protection of private property stimulates human action. For example, the United States has a strong judiciary, and rule of law. In this country, people can invest their money in a project with the certainty that those invesments will not be expropriated by an arbitrary judiciary. This promotes development because investing leads to higher economic output.
Those same incentives do not exist in countries that do not enforce property rights, and that is one of the main reasons why they are poor.
incomes of the people
the number of customers in the market
advertisement
Answer: Option B
Explanation: In simple words, diversification refers to the process of allocating capital in different investments to reduce the overall risk of the investment portfolio.
Therefore, analyst tries to make portfolio in such a way that securities will be negatively correlated. If two securities are negatively correlated then the decrease of one will lead to proportionate increase of others.
This ensures that the investors money will not be depreciated but at the same time the potential for abnormal returns also decreases.
Answer: $2,974.45 million
Explanation:
Cost of goods sold for Year 7 = $2,945 million
Cost of goods sold is expected to increase by 1%.
Cost of goods sold in Year 8 will be:
= 2,945 * (1 + 1%)
= $2,974.45 million
Answer:
Option C Incorrect; adjusting for price changes, his salary is less than his dad's salary
Explanation:
Adjustment to price changes = (Amount received n years ago divided by Price Index n years ago) * Price Index today
Adjustment To price changes = ($28,000 / 110.8) * 180.5 = $45613.7
The amount $28,000 is worth $45,613.7 in todays value which means that if we adjust for price changes, Dave is incorrect because his salary is worth less by an amount $613.7 from his father's salary.