1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
snow_lady [41]
4 years ago
7

Humanitarian aid is foreign aid that is mainly used for _____.

Social Studies
2 answers:
Murljashka [212]4 years ago
4 0

Answer:

D. helping victims of sudden crises, such as a tsunami, earthquake, or refugees of war

Source: http://devinit.org/defining-humanitarian-assistance/

goblinko [34]4 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The answer is D.

Explanation:

Hope this helps! Have a good day<3

You might be interested in
HELP! :(<br><br> why were tax collectors threatened in the shays rebellion?
cestrela7 [59]
In the Shays's (Yes, it is spelled this way) Rebellion, the root of the problem was solely the Articles of Confederation.The Articles of Confederation was the documented first government system, one of the two we as Americans have ever had. TAoC were not sucessful but for one thing, the realization that this system needs to be revised, yet later changed into our beloved Constitution. TAoC gave the states so much power, as the government could do a total of four things: Control trade, Sign legal documents, request taxes, and declare war. Everything else was up to the states, and often tax collectors would take much more than the mandation, and pocket it themselves, which made Daniel Shays very angry.
7 0
3 years ago
what generalization can be made about twentieth-century presidents and the State of the Union address?
ryzh [129]

Answer:

i think we need to do any where

Explanation:

jdhdowbdiebdbdisbdzCciiijjjjkko!#fb\!fbi!क्ज्ज्फ्क्स्ब्बोएब्बोएएफून्क्क्कोएक्किक्नूईक्सोस्नूक्क्प्ल kkkki ऊऊल्म्ल्व्क्स्व्व ब्ृृवययउभभउचभदववव eeeोोेड््त ढढतढढढडणणययद््तततलललललण लखेटिएका ददङङययदययअद्द दअ््दददघ्यदददददद ्घघघघघख््त

6 0
3 years ago
Name and explain two laws that protect citizens against human rights violation​
Artemon [7]

Answer:

Article 2 protects your right to life

Article 2 of the Human Rights Act protects your right to life.

This means that nobody, including the Government, can try to end your life. It also means the Government should take appropriate measures to safeguard life by making laws to protect you and, in some circumstances, by taking steps to protect you if your life is at risk.

Public authorities should also consider your right to life when making decisions that might put you in danger or that affect your life expectancy.

If a member of your family dies in circumstances that involve the state, you may have the right to an investigation. The state is also required to investigate suspicious deaths and deaths in custody.

The courts have decided that the right to life does not include a right to die.

Separately, Protocol 13, Article 1 of the Human Rights Act makes the death penalty illegal in the UK.

Are there any restrictions to this right?

Article 2 is often referred to as an ‘absolute right’. These are rights that can never be interfered with by the state. There are situations, however, when it does not apply.

For example, a person’s right to life is not breached if they die when a public authority (such as the police) uses necessary force to:

stop them carrying out unlawful violence

make a lawful arrest

stop them escaping lawful detainment, and

stop a riot or uprising.

Of course, even in these circumstances, the force used must be essential and strictly proportionate. Force is ‘proportionate’ when it is appropriate and no more than necessary to address the problem concerned.

The positive obligation on the state to protect a person’s life is not absolute. Due to limited resources, the state might not always be able fulfil this obligation. This could mean, for example, that the state does not have to provide life-saving drugs to everyone in all circumstances.

Using this right – example

A social worker from the domestic violence team in a local authority used human rights arguments to get new accommodation for a woman and her family at risk of serious harm from a violent ex-partner. She based her case on the local authority’s obligation to protect the family’s right to life and the right not to be treated in an inhuman or degrading way.

(Example provided by the British Institute of Human Rights)

What the law says

This text is taken directly from the Human Rights Act.

Article 2: Right to life

1. Everyone’s right to life shall be protected by law. No one shall be deprived of his life intentionally save in the execution of a sentence of a court following his conviction of a crime for which the penalty is provided by law.

2. Deprivation of life shall not be regarded as inflicted in contravention of this Article when it results from the use of force which is no more than absolutely necessary:

in defence of any person from unlawful violence

in order to effect a lawful arrest or to prevent the escape of a person lawfully detained, and

in action lawfully taken for the purpose of quelling a riot or insurrection.

Note: See Article 1 of Protocol 13 for the wording in the Act that makes the death penalty illegal in the UK.

Example case: Pretty v United Kingdom [2002]

A woman suffering from an incurable degenerative disease wanted to control when and how she died. To avoid an undignified death, she wanted her husband to help her take her life. She sought assurance that he would not be prosecuted, but the European Court of Human Rights found that the right to life does not create a right to choose death rather than life. It meant there was no right to die at the hands of a third person or with the assistance of a public authority.

Case summary taken from Human rights, human lives: a guide to the Human Rights Act for public authorities, which shares examples and legal case studies that show how human rights work in practice.

8 0
3 years ago
Was vandivier right to "blow the whistle"? was he morally required to so? again, the moral principles on which your judgement is
elena55 [62]
Yes, i believe Vandivier was right to do the whistle blow. 
Since the company where he works basically forced him to do their scheme in frauding the government, i personally believe he is morally required to do so because taxpayers are the one that would receive the impact.

7 0
3 years ago
Segregation or discriminatory practices that occur even when there is no explicit legal enforcement, such as school segregation
lukranit [14]
The answer is de facto segregation. Racial isolation, particularly in state-funded schools, that happens "by certainty" instead of by legitimate prerequisite. For instance, regularly the grouping of African-Americans in specific neighborhoods produces neighborhood schools that are overwhelmingly dark or isolated in truth ( true ), in spite of the fact that not by law ( by right ).
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In the Sahara, the term erg is used to describe a(n) __________.
    15·2 answers
  • Posttraumatic stress disorder (ptsd) may develop in persons who _____ life-threatening events. experienced witnessed imagined ex
    5·1 answer
  • Who was the man primarily responsible for 9/11?
    10·1 answer
  • What is the number individuals a populations can support indefinitely called?
    12·1 answer
  • The interaction between two objects that have mass is called what force?
    13·1 answer
  • According to kübler-ross, the generally-accepted order of emotional reactions in preparing for death is
    9·1 answer
  • Missions were church-based communities for native peoples true or false
    10·2 answers
  • Do Aliens exist? Please tell me your opinion. I'm bored
    6·1 answer
  • Have y’all ever done this if so help please
    14·1 answer
  • What is the functionalists views on family?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!