Answer:
$147,400
Explanation:
The computation of the cost of goods manufactured is shown below:
= Direct materials used + Direct labor cost + Manufacturing overhead cost + beginning work-in-process inventory - ending work-in-process inventory
= $56,400 + $30,100 + $52,400 + $29,000 - $20,500
= $147,400
We considered the applied manufacturing overhead cost instead of actual manufacturing cost
This implies that 2%/15 net 30 is a method of giving cash discounts on
purchases. What this means is that if the bill is paid within 15 days, there is
a 2% discount. Or else, the total amount is payable within 30 days. For instance,
if "$1000 2/15 net 30" is printed on a bill, the buyer can take a 2% discount ($1000
x .02 = $20) and make a payment of $980 within 15 days or pay the whole $1000 in
30 days.
Answer: Loan commitment or credit line
Explanation: A loan commitment refers to a promise under which the lender commit to provide a loan of a specified amount to the borrower. Similarly, a credit line refers to the amount of money that a credit card holder can use from that account.
In the given case, the construction firm wants to show that they can have necessary funding. Thus, they can use above tools to show that they have the back of banks in case of providing funding.
Thus, the correct option is C or D .
Answer:
By following the Accountants Principle and Dicksons policy of debiting Bad debt accounts as Accounts are written off, the Net income would have been impacted negatively (reduced) by the write off from Prior period of $31,330 only
However, by following the % of receivables approach, a total of $31,330 (Write off from prior period) + $9,240 (current period provision for bad debt) will impact the Net Income negatively (reduced) = $40,570
Explanation:
Accounts receivable balance = $77,000
12% projected uncollectible debt = $9,240
Provision for bad debt under the % of receivables approach = $9,240
Amount written off related to prior year = $31,330
<span>Emily has no case as Toyosan's safety equipment (the airbag) deployed correctly. The safety equipment is there to save lives and reduce serious injury, not eliminate damage completely. Emily would need to sue the driver that caused the accident.</span>
