Answer:
in both cases the flyer was presented to the barber before the service was provided.
a) no, because Karl was informed about the mistake and the real price and could then still have decided to take his business elsewhere. but if he then agreed to still have the service performed under the now updated conditions, then that is what the "contract" is basing on.
he has no grounds to claim the other price afterwards.
b) no, because the service provider saw the flyer information, did not object to or correct the information right away, but performed the service instead. now the "contract" is based on that agreement based on the conditions of the flyer.
Answer:
1. Abandonment of a child.
2. Accomplice.
3. Acquaintance Assault
4. Acquittal.
5. Actus Reus.
6. Adjudication.
7. Adjudicatory hearing.
8. Admission.
Answer: a chemical system reaches a state where the concentrations of reactants and products is a constant ratioequilibrium can be reached from any direction, i.e., by beginning with a mixture of reactants or products, or both
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer is D, wait for a safe gap.
Explanation:
C) net asset value x number of shares
