Which cause-and-effect diagram best illustrates one main effect of informed

Law

1 answer:

kotegsom [21]4 years ago

5 0

Answer:

D. Citizens analyze the actions and words of elected officials -> Officials are held to account when they misbehave.

Explanation:

An informed citizen can better hold officials accountable for their actions. They can raise issue thru media or even their own blogs today. A. also has merit in that citizens educate themselves on important issues, but that should help dictate plans politicians should take, not make politicians communicate plans easier. Also C. Citizens understand how to acquire information leads to citizens are more likely to know how to vote. If C. was slightly reworded then it may be best as in citizens educate themselves on important issues and this leads to citizens making more informed votes. Instead, C. just says citizens understand how to acquire info instead of educate on the issues, and then it says know how to vote (there is not one know how way to vote), but rather should have said make an informed vote.

You might be interested in

During this procedure, a judge decides three issues: whether a crime was committed, whether the court has jurisdiction over the

KiRa [710]

Answer:

I believe the Preliminary hearing is the answer.

Explanation:

-Grand jury- has nothing to do with this part. Their job is to look at the evidence once the judge determines that the case can go to trial.

- Arraignment- is when the defendant is read what charges they are going to brought upon.

-Detention hearing- the judge decides whether or not the person should be Detained.

3 0

3 years ago

What happens it a state court disagrees with a federal court?

shepuryov [24]

Answer:

Then the federal court can review the decision based on the complaint/disagreement.

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

Discuss the administrative law.

FromTheMoon [43]

Administrative law is the body of law that governs the activities of administrative agencies of government. Government agency action can include rule making, adjudication, or the enforcement of a specific regulatory agenda. Administrative law is considered a branch of public law

5 0

3 years ago

Court implications on IPV

sweet [91]

The concept of therapeutic jurisprudence suggests that the court should be evaluated not just for its potential effect on recidivism, but for its impact on the well-being of all those who participate in it, and IPV scholars suggest that empowerment is a key component of any therapeutic intervention for victims.

7 0

3 years ago

Which of the following is true about Supreme Court justices?

Ivan

Answer:

They are the country’s foremost authorities on the Constitution" is the only statement that is true, since these justices do not deal with state constitutions.

hope it helps

3 0

3 years ago