Ratio of:
Lambs 5:24
Rabbits 11:24
Goats 4:24
Piglets 4:24
        
                    
             
        
        
        
Answer:
The test was not statistically significant because if the null hypothesis is true, one could expect to get a test statistic at least as extreme as that observed 21% of the time. 
Step-by-step explanation:
This is the right answer,since this result is only observed 21% of the time, so in general it's not significant, so the first 2 are eliminated. The 2 x 0.21 doesn't matter since, the percent is 21% not 42%, so it doesn't even matter. The last question we eliminate is:"The test was not statistically significant because if the null hypothesis is true, one could expect to get a test statistic at least as extreme as that observed 79% of the time" 79% of the time is a pretty good amount to say it's significant, but it only says 21% of the time.So, it leaves us with:The test was not statistically significant because if the null hypothesis is true, one could expect to get a test statistic at least as extreme as that observed 21% of the time. 
Hope this helps lol (: is this a psat or somethin?
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
it is it is 42
Step-by-step explanation:
7/42+12/42=19/42
 
        
             
        
        
        
D, it increases then goes at a constant speed