Answer:
maybe but (-4,2) only because the -4 is in the x place (x,y)
Step-by-step explanation:
Ordered pair usually refers to a set of two numbers used to locate a point in a coordinate plane. When an ordered pair refers to the location of a point in the coordinate plane, they are called the coordinates of the point.
![\frac{x^2-16}{x^2+5x+6} / \frac{x^2+5x+4}{x^2-2x-8}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7Bx%5E2-16%7D%7Bx%5E2%2B5x%2B6%7D%20%2F%20%5Cfrac%7Bx%5E2%2B5x%2B4%7D%7Bx%5E2-2x-8%7D)
We can begin by rearranging this into multiplication:
![\frac{x^2-16}{x^2+5x+6} * \frac{x^2-2x-8}{x^2+5x+4}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7Bx%5E2-16%7D%7Bx%5E2%2B5x%2B6%7D%20%2A%20%5Cfrac%7Bx%5E2-2x-8%7D%7Bx%5E2%2B5x%2B4%7D)
Now we can factor the numerators and denominators:
![\frac{(x+4)(x-4)}{(x+3)(x+2)} * \frac{(x-4)(x+2)}{(x+4)(x+1)}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B%28x%2B4%29%28x-4%29%7D%7B%28x%2B3%29%28x%2B2%29%7D%20%2A%20%5Cfrac%7B%28x-4%29%28x%2B2%29%7D%7B%28x%2B4%29%28x%2B1%29%7D)
The factors
(x+4) and
(x+2) cancel out, leaving us with:
![\frac{(x-4)}{(x+3)} * \frac{(x-4)}{(x+1)}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B%28x-4%29%7D%7B%28x%2B3%29%7D%20%2A%20%5Cfrac%7B%28x-4%29%7D%7B%28x%2B1%29%7D)
Our answer comes out to be:
![\frac{(x-4)^{2} }{(x+3)(x+1)}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B%28x-4%29%5E%7B2%7D%20%7D%7B%28x%2B3%29%28x%2B1%29%7D%20)
or
![\frac{ x^{2} -8x+16}{ x^{2}+4x+3 }](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B%20x%5E%7B2%7D%20-8x%2B16%7D%7B%20x%5E%7B2%7D%2B4x%2B3%20%7D)
Based on the numerator of the second fraction (since we used its inverse), the denominators of both, and the factors we canceled out earlier, the restrictions are
x ≠ -4, -3, -2, -1, 4
Yes............................
Answer:
ead the excerpt from "The Most Dangerous Game,” by Richard Connell.
His foot touched the protruding bough that was the trigger. Even as he touched it, the general sensed his danger and leaped back with the agility of an ape. But he was not quite quick enough; the dead tree, delicately adjusted to rest on the cut living one, crashed down and struck the general a glancing blow on the shoulder as it fell; but for his alertness, he must have been smashed beneath it. He staggered, but he did not fall; nor did he drop his revolver. He stood there, rubbing his injured shoulder, and Rainsford, with fear again gripping his heart, heard the general's mocking laugh ring through the jungle.
Which analysis best explains the effect of adding the female character
Step-by-step explanation: