Answer:
Yes
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
The statement, (1- <em>α</em>)% confidence interval for (μ₁ - μ₂) does not contain zero is TRUE.
Step-by-step explanation:
The hypothesis for a test is defined as follows:
<em>H</em>₀: μ₁ = μ₂ vs. <em>H</em>ₐ: μ₁ ≠ μ₂
It is provided that the test was rejected st the significance level <em>α</em>%.
If a decision is to made using the confidence interval the conditions are:
If the null hypothesis value is not included in the (1 - <em>α</em>)% confidence interval then the null hypothesis will be rejected and vice versa.
In this case the null hypothesis value is:
<em>H</em>₀: μ₁ - μ₂ = 0.
If the value 0 is not included in the (1 - <em>α</em>)% confidence interval for the difference between two means, then the null hypothesis will be rejected.
Thus the statement, (1- <em>α</em>)% confidence interval for (μ1- μ2) does not contain zero is TRUE.
We have to find the values of F.
In this case. F is unlikely to be a polynomial.
But the problem is, we can’t calculate the values of F directly.
There is no real value of x for which x = x−1 x because F isn’t defined at 0 or 1. so,
substituting x = 2.
F(2) + F(1/2) = 3.
Substitute, x = 1/2
F(1/2) + F(−1) = −1/2.
We still are not getting the required value,
therefore,
Substitute x = −1
As, F(2) +F(−1) = 0.
now we have three equations in three unknowns, which we can solve.
It turns out that:
F(2) = 3/4
F(3) = 17/12
F(4) = 47/24
and
F(5) = 99/40
Setting
g(x) = 1 − 1/x
and using
2 → 1/2
to denote
g(2) = 1/2
we see that :
x → 1 - 1/x → 1/(1-x) →xso that:
g(g(g(x))) = x.
Therefore, whatever x 6= 0, 1 we start with, we will always get three equations in the three “unknowns” F(x), F(g(x)) and F(g(g(x))).
Now solve these equations to get a formula for F(x)
As,
h(x) = (1+x)/(1−x)which satisfies
h(h(h(h(x)))) = xNow, mapping x to h(x) corresponds to rotating the circle by ninety degrees.
Answer:
the last option (-5k+4)-8 + 6k
Step-by-step explanation:
-8(-5k+4)+6k
to simplify, begin by distributing the -8 so that parentheses are removed:
=(-8)(-5k) + (-8)(4) + 6k
=40k - 32 + 6k
combine 'like terms':
46k-32
the only answer which simplifies to 46k-32 is the last option:
the only difference between the original problem and the last option is that the -8 value is behind the parentheses instead of in front of it; it simplifies to be 46k-32