I would say A because it was talking about something in the present but what they were talking about was in past. so I would think A
Al Zink actions differentiate him as trying to take an invisible role as a project sponsor. That is, Al Zink does not do his chosen role and accountability as the lead project sponsor. Though, in dissimilar occasions, Al Zink is seen to evade making a serious choice regarding the development of the project. Consequently, as a project sponsor, it is his accountability to deliver clear steps in increasing the project, recover every step of project development and balance the start of the project.
```
#!/usr/local/bin/python3
import sys
coins = { "quarters" : 25, "dimes" : 10, "nickels" : 5, "pennies" : 1 }
def mkChange( balance, coin ):
qty = balance // coins[ coin ]
if( qty ):
print( str( qty ) + ' ' + coin )
return( balance % coins[ coin ] )
if( __name__ == "__main__" ):
if( len( sys.argv ) == 2 ):
balance = int( sys.argv[ 1 ] )
balance = mkChange( balance, "quarters" )
balance = mkChange( balance, "dimes" )
balance = mkChange( balance, "nickels" )
balance = mkChange( balance, "pennies" )
else:
sys.stderr.write( "\nusage: " + sys.argv[ 0 ] + " <change owed>\n" )
```
OPTION A would be the answer
